Home: Meeting Minutes List: Meeting Minutes

March 27, 2006

 

Mayor Sohm welcomed and thanked everyone for attending the meeting.

Pastor Robert Stoess, Shepherdsville Church of Nazarene gave the invocation.

 

The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag was said.

 

Mayor Sohm called the meeting to order at 6:32 p.m.

 

In attendance were Council members Stacey Cline, Tony Miller, Margaret Moore, Faith Portman, Trina Summers and Alan Wetzel.

 

Stacey Cline made motion to dispense with reading of 3/13/2006 regular meeting minutes. Trina Summers 2nd. Motion carried 6-0.

 

Councilwoman Trina Summers made motion to approve minutes as printed with date correction. Tony Miller 2nd. Motion carried 6-0.

 

Mayor Sohm introduced Christopher Tate with CASA (Court Appointed Special Advocates) who explained that this is a program that provides protection for children who are part of the court system. He stated they were looking for members to mentor children and asked anyone with questions to contact his office located in the Wantland Law Office building.

 

Mayor Sohm stated that Troy Fleming was scheduled to make a presentation on the new web site but he had a family emergency and will be at the next meeting.

 

Mayor Sohm introduced David Strange with the Bullitt County History Museum who stated that he had received the $6710 grant money to help cover expenses at the cemetery. He also stated that the historic marker had been designed and sent off to be made. Mayor Sohm asked Public Works Foreman Jesse Walls about the fence being put up around the cemetery. PWF Walls stated that most of the fence was up; he needs to dig footers and put up concrete posts for the arch.

 

Mayor Sohm stated for several years we have discussed possible solutions to the drainage problems we have throughout the City. He stated most of them, granted, happened prior to the Design Criteria that was passed in late 1998 or early 1999. From that date forward developers had to go through plan review. An engineer would have to look at it, sign off on it and make sure that the drainage was going to be right by doing pre and post development flows to make sure they were not going to add water on to property down stream and they were going to hold back the right amount of retention and not cause erosion on the development they were building. But as you well know as Council Members you get phone calls all the time. There are still a lot of issues around town in some of the subdivisions that were built prior to the Design Criteria.  Mayor Sohm stated he would like to look at creating a city-wide comprehensive drainage plan to address these problems. We now have an engineer on staff, somebody with the knowledge and experience that can look at different problems and determine what caused it, what the best solution would be, estimate what the cost of construction would be, how many people would be benefited by the fix that we come up with, is it a safety issue, is it a health issue, is it going to cause anybody else problems down stream. What we would always have to do in the past is hire an engineering firm, pay them an enormous amount of money to answer those questions for us and then still pay the construction costs. He stated too often those types of projects just didn’t get done. He stated what he would like to do is ask for the Council’s support in going forward with this project. Mayor Sohm stated he would like to set up a committee consisting of the engineer, a couple council members, developers and possibly employees that work on drainage or employees who work on sewers; have this committee list all these projects--we’ve got Beech Grove Road we’ve had complaints on, The Pointe subdivision, Cherry Street, Blue Lick Road, and Highway 44. He stated Shepherdsville is flat, the soil is not good, the water stands in it, and it doesn’t soak in like other elevations would. Mayor Sohm stated  we’ve got those problems and we’re going to have to deal with them. He stated he think it’s time that we, as a City, step forward and say we know that we’re not responsible, we didn’t cause the problem, but we owe it to the taxpayers to do what he can to try  to solve some of these problems. He stated if we set this committee up, we list all these projects, prioritize them; we’ll pick the criteria that we want to prioritize them by, maybe it’s how many we can help per $1000 or which is the safety issue first, those come up priority number one; health issue, priority number two. He stated we need to talk about this as a group; then this governing body has to make the decision as to how much money we appropriate for this project each year. He stated we need to work diligently between now and the next budget on how many projects we’re going to have, size of the project, and list those to come up with what we think we can afford to appropriate to this cause. He stated what he would like to do, if everybody is in favor, and thinks this is a good idea, is to put the employees we have talked about hiring to put in the sewer line; who will be on staff within a week or so before we have materials  to start the sewer line is to take this crew and put them on a drainage problem. The engineer would first go over and find out what the best fix would be. He stated he would like the first project to be the ditch that’s in behind The Pointe subdivision; if this project is successful we would move forward and work on some more of these projects. Mayor Sohm stated he would like to hear everybody’s comments. Councilman Alan Wetzel and Councilwoman Faith Portman stated they strongly support this proposal. Councilwoman Margaret Moore stated she has a problem with this already. She stated The Pointe has been here for 10-12 years and that Mr. Wilbur Raymond has been here for years. She stated she thinks we need to take care of this gentleman first in two locations.  Mayor Sohm stated he just made a short list to talk about and that Mr. Raymond was on the list. Ms. Moore stated he should be given priority. Mayor Sohm stated that’s exactly the point, Ms. Moore brings up Wilbur Raymond, and Trina Summers brings up Gaither Flatt (Ms. Summers agreed with Ms. Moore that Mr. Raymond should be a priority). Mayor Sohm stated this is why we need to get a Committee formed that can say okay Wilbur Raymond’s problem is a safety issue for him, so we have to do that one first. The Committee will prioritize these projects and rely on the experience and expertise of the Engineer. Mayor Sohm stated he feels we have an opportunity and we owe it to the community to take care of these types of issues in a professional manner just like we would any other issue. Councilman Alan Wetzel asked how many members we need on this committee. Mayor Sohm asked City Engineer Toby Spalding how many members he would like on the committee. CE Spalding stated possibly three council members but he has no set number in mind, probably six. He stated what the Committee would be for is to determine first, what the criteria for prioritizing will be. If we’re going to spend $5000 and that only helps one person, when we can spend $4000 and help ten. Is this a safety issue where there is a four foot drop off in a back yard versus a health issue where there are mosquitoes or that type of problem. He stated there are so many things you have to list as your criteria in order to make that right decision. City Engineer Toby Spalding stated he thinks that drainage requests could come either directly to his office or through the City Council who could relay the problem to him so that he could go out and research to see first, if it is a problem; if there is anything we can do; and look at the numbers on repair. Mayor Sohm stated that he just mentioned The Pointe, we may have time to do that one and Wilbur Raymond. City Engineer Spalding stated that in regard to Mr. Raymond’s property Louisville Water Company has offered the material to work on his drainage but not the manpower. Mayor Sohm stated that what he wanted to point out was, if we start the first project, there are going to be more that are going to follow. Everyone is going to expect the same treatment. He stated there are a couple things that are going to have to happen. If there is not an easement, the property owners are going to have to agree to sign one; they are also going to have to sign a letter saying they will maintain it once it is there. He stated this is the only way we can do it, we can’t go in every five years and rebuild a ditch line. Councilwoman Trina Summers stated what she would like to see come out of it as well is we have a comprehensive plan and an identification of areas that just should not be developed. She would like to see a identification of those water ways and drainage areas added to the list so when people buy property they can check that. Mayor Sohm stated that was in place now during the plan review process. The developer has to hire a separate engineer, and they do a pre and post development flow to determine how much retention is needed, whether they have to build a pond. City Engineer Spalding stated he thinks what Councilwoman Summers was saying is that she would like to catch it a step earlier where a developer would know going in where houses shouldn’t be built or already has restrictions.

 

Both Councilwomen Trina Summers and Stacey Cline are in favor. Mayor Sohm stated that if everyone is in support we’ll move forward and start working on the process of getting the information in place, getting the criteria set and then we’ll put together a committee to start meeting relatively soon to start getting priorities set. City Engineer Spalding stated that we’ve been working on a map with the Louisville Water Company and hopefully in the next few weeks we’ll get that and it will give us a perfect model to start documenting these. Then we’ll schedule meetings once a month or every two-three months. He stated that every time he gets a request it will be mapped on the system; marked with a  red line so we know that one has already been looked at and there should be a solution there already. He stated if we start off there we can improve on it as we go.

 

City Attorney Joe Wantland had second summary reading of Ordinance 006-(number to be assigned) amending Ordinance 005-658 an Ordinance providing Personnel Policies and Procedures for all employees of City Government located in the City of Shepherdsville. Tony Miller made motion to approve. Alan Wetzel 2nd. After some discussion, motion carried 6-0. (This Ordinance will be numbered 006-689).

 

City Attorney Wantland had second summary reading of Ordinance 006-(number to be assigned) an Ordinance relating to the establishment of a Civil Service Commission for the employees of the City of Shepherdsville. Mayor Sohm stated that he is in favor of this Ordinance and will support it. He feels it is an opportunity to protect our employees. Councilman Alan Wetzel stated he was very strongly in support of this Ordinance. He stated he feels it is a great opportunity for our employees to have some added protection but he stated he is somewhat concerned with Section 8 under the Membership area. He stated he would like make a motion to change the wording to the effect of the Mayor, by and with the approval of the Legislative Body shall approve …. Faith Portman 2nd. Councilwoman Portman asked if we could talk about the Ordinance. Mayor Sohm stated we have a motion on the floor and a second to approve the amendment. City Attorney Wantland stated we have a motion to approve the Ordinance as amended with a second. Councilwoman Portman stated no she thought we were going to discuss. CA Wantland stated we have a motion to approve the Ordinance as amended and we are looking for a 2nd. Trina Summers 2nd as amended. Councilwoman Portman stated she had been talking with a lot of people in the public and a lot of employees and a lot of them are concerned for different reasons. She asked if this had to be voted on tonight because a lot of employees feel that we should give them the opportunity to let them read this and fill them in a little bit better. Mayor Sohm stated we have been talking about this, before I brought it to this Council, for 2 or 3 years, and originally the thought was to protect the police department and in doing more research on it I thought it would be the best thing to protect all the employees because we didn’t want to leave anyone out. That’s what led us to the point in protecting everyone. We’ve done a lot of leg work, and maybe this will help ease that question. When this passes, our plan will be as it has been in the past to sit up a training course where we will have the employees come in and we will go over and explain the Ordinance in detail. After further discussion, motion carried 6-0. (This Ordinance will be numbered 006-690.)  

 

City Attorney Wantland had second reading of Ordinance 006-(number to be assigned) amending Ordinance 002-544 revising the compensation of the Mayor and City Council of the City of Shepherdsville for the term beginning January 1, 2007. Councilman Alan Wetzel asked City Attorney Wantland rather than set a dollar amount is there any way to index it somehow. City Attorney Wantland stated Consumer Price Index. He also stated that the only reason he brought it up was that if we don’t do it now we don’t do it. He stated it looks like this was set in 2002 so we’re not going to set it again for the Mayor until 2010 and the Council you might be able to fit it in every two years. City Attorney Wantland stated he basically took the old salary and adjusted to the CPI accordingly but we can put in there that from and after January 2007 the annual base salary of the Mayor of the City of Shepherdsville shall be $49,000 and thereafter be adjusted annually by any increase or decrease in the CPI. And on the Council we’ll use $7200 base and adjusted annually by increase or decrease in the CPI as reported by the Department of Labor of the U.S. Government. Section four will be eliminated. After further discussion Faith Portman made motion to approve as amended. Trina Summers 2nd. Motion carried 6-0. (This Ordinance will be numbered 006-691.)

 

Mayor Sohm stated we have talked about the Sewer Committee and we really haven’t had a need to meet with this particular group. He stated what we want to do instead of having a Sewer Committee comprised of individuals from the community is have a Progress Meeting the 4th Monday of every month at 5:00 and invite the Council to attend if they’d like. He stated if it’s a project we’re farming out that we can’t do with our crew that person would be here to answer questions, City Engineer Spalding would be there to answer questions and give us a progress report on how the project is moving. He stated we would like to set this up at a certain date so that everybody knows when it is and can come by if you’d like. He stated we would like to do it on a meeting night since you are coming to City Hall anyway. Wastewater Treatment Plant Superintendent Mike Schroeder will also be involved for specific sewer plant questions. City Engineer Spalding stated it would be an informative meeting as there will be a lot going on in the next 2 to 3 years. Mayor Sohm stated there will no longer be need for a Sewer Committee Report; we’ll have a report from City Engineer Toby Spalding  on capital projects and WWTPS Mike Schroeder on the sewer plant.

 

Mayor Sohm introduced Ron Cook from the Governor’s office who stated he has been managing the cemetery preservation grant projects and had a check presentation for $6710 for Shepherdsville’s cemetery preservation project applied for by David Strange of the Bullitt County History Museum. Mayor Sohm stated Mr. Strange was not aware that Mr. Cook would be available tonight for the presentation and had left to attend another meeting.

 

There was no report from the Transportation/Beautification Committee.

 

Mayor Sohm asked Public Works Foreman Jesse Walls on the progress of putting in the playground equipment on

 

City Attorney Wantland read Resolution 06-04; A Resolution for acquisition of property for the all purpose building and the financing of this property by the City of Shepherdsville, Bullitt County, Kentucky. Mayor Sohm stated this was the Resolution for equipment acquisition for the new police/fire building. Trina Summers made motion to approve. Margaret Moore 2nd. Motion carried 6-0.

 

City Attorney Wantland read Resolution of Governing Body authorizing the execution and delivery of a Master Lease Agreement, Equipment Schedule No. 01, and Escrow Agreement, and related instruments, and determining other matters in connection therewith. City Attorney Wantland stated this give the Mayor authority to sign documents. Alan Wetzel made motion to approve. Faith Portman 2nd. Motion carried 6-0.

 

City Attorney Wantland read Resolution 06-006, Series 2006; A Resolution approving the granting of inducements to GFS Food Service, LLC as an approved affiliate of Institutional Distributors, Inc. pursuant to KRS Chapter 154, Subsection 24. Trina Summers made motion to adopt. Faith Portman 2nd. Motion carried 6-0.

 

Discussion followed on request from Ted Korfhage, Heritage Hill, to put up three street signs in Section 2; Gaither Farm Road, John R. Gaither Court, Gaither Woods Court. Mayor Sohm stated we can put street signs up but that does not mean we have accepted the streets. Faith Portman made motion to put up three street signs and three stop signs. Stacey Cline 2nd. Motion carried 6-0.

 

Margaret Moore made motion to approve payment of February bills. Tony Miller 2nd. Motion carried 6-0.

 

Ted Korfhage was present to address the Council on exit beautification. He stated that if the Council had never been to the 2nd Bowling Green exit they should drive there and see how great it looks. He will have some information soon on a meeting to be held on how they received funding through the federal government for the beautification. He stated he would like to have all five exits signed up for this beatification program.

 

Steve Plenge was present to address the Council about the Hamilton rezoning. He stated on the request for information act he received a copy of the Ordinance that was adopted concerning the Hamilton rezoning and he feels there is an error concerning item F concerning the loading dock location. He stated the discussion that night was that, and agreed to by the Hamilton family, the loading docks would be opposite the Heritage Hill property and item F on the Ordinance just says that the parking lots would not be located on the east side of the building. It doesn’t preclude lateral truck docks. Mayor Sohm stated he didn’t think there were any restrictions on cross docking. He stated Mr. Hamilton was not present to ask. Mr. Korfhage stated he signed up to speak on this as well. He stated they had got the tape and on the tape it says loading docks opposite of Heritage Hill properties. It doesn’t say anything about east, west, north or south, it says on the property opposite. At the next meeting the Council voted to put the Ordinance according to what the tape said. We got a copy of the tape and our copy of the tape says that they be opposite of Heritage Hill. Mr. Plenge stated the question asked of Mr. Hamilton … City Attorney Wantland asked Mr. Plenge where we were going with this. He stated we were not going to have another hearing on this. Mr. Korfhage stated it wasn’t written up to what the City Council asked to be written up. The City Council asked that it be written up according to the tape and when you listen to the tape Mayor Sohm said, so you’re agreeing Mr. Hamilton that you run your buildings this direction that you’re going to put your loading docks on the opposite side and Mr. Hamilton said yes. This is not what they agreed to. He stated the Ordinance is incorrect according to the minutes. Mayor Sohm stated he feels we are wasting our time. If the Hamilton family is not here to address the issue and the Hamilton family has said we don’t agree with not putting the docks on both sides of the building if they are not facing that property line, if they’ve already said that’s not what they agreed to we can’t make them agree to that if they don’t want to agree to that. City Attorney Wantland stated to the members of the Council that this is not properly brought before this meeting. He stated if you want to have a discussion on this you have to go back and if you want to invite the Hamilton’s to come invite them to come but we’re not going to go back and discuss this without everyone being here and given public notice and advertised as required by law. Councilman Wetzel asked what the document was that had the error in it. He stated if they knew what the document was and who made the document then we can figure out who needs to make a correction. City Attorney Wantland stated he is the one who worked on the restrictions. Mayor Sohm stated that any time you add restrictions to an Ordinance the person who is requesting the rezoning and has agreed to those restrictions has to sign the restrictions they agreed to.  He stated you can’t just take their word at a meeting. He stated that is why that document exists. It should exist for any Ordinance where there is a rezoning and there are restrictions outside of the normal rezoning process. They are agreed to so that they can belong to that Ordinance and be part of it. Mayor Sohm stated that if there is anything incorrect and Mr. Hamilton didn’t agree with it or anyone else didn’t agree with it, they wouldn’t have signed it.

 

Kenny Stout,

 

Planning Commission Appointee Ben Robards had nothing new to report.

 

Board of Adjustments Appointee Scott Isert was not present at the meeting.

 

Police Chief Ron Morris thanked the Council for their work and passage of the Civil Service Ordinance.

 

Major Dannye Allen reported that on April 7th at 3:30 p.m. Senator Gary Tapp would be at City Hall to make a presentation to the fire department. He stated that Shepherdsville, Zoneton and Fairdale Fire Departments were the only three departments certified in the State to do mine rescue. He stated that will help the department get grant money.

 

Councilwoman Trina Summers asked about closing the road by St. Aloysius. City Attorney Wantland stated he was waiting on paperwork from Mr. Klosterman. He stated he needs a plat of the right of way.

 

Councilman Tony Miller stated he had been approached by a few people about needing transportation. He stated several years ago there was a taxi cab service. Mayor Sohm stated there is a TARC bus that comes here but it has a dedicated route back and forth to Louisville. He stated we could address a letter to TARC asking them to amend their route. The problem is they won’t come to an individual’s home. He stated they would have to meet somewhere, right now TARC picks up at the old Shepherdsville High School, but we could ask them to amend their route to pick them up, get on the Interstate, drop them off at the Industrial Park and then get back on. Bob Fouts, Director of the Bullitt County Economic Development Authority, who was in the audience stated he has spoken with TARC about getting a route to the Industrial Park and they are considering it. Mayor Sohm asked The Pioneer News if he could pose the question if public transportation was available, would you use it?

 

Councilwoman Margaret Moore stated she had received a request about a having a clean up day. Mayor Sohm asked if we should wait after the County completes theirs then we will make plans for a citywide clean up. Ms. Moore also asked about the status of putting the parking meters back up. Mayor Sohm stated that Claude Middleton was going to paint them before we put them up and he has been off on disability and will not return until 4/21. After Claude gets them painted they will be put back up. Ms. Moore also asked about the audit. City Treasurer, Maxine Jeffries, reported the auditors will not be back until after tax season and that it shouldn’t take long to complete after they get back.

 

Mayor Sohm stated he wanted to thank our City Attorney for being here tonight, he’s been a little under the weather and we appreciate his presence. Mayor Sohm also stated he wanted to thank the Council for believing in our employees in taking steps necessary to protect their jobs and ensure that they are treated fairly in the future. 

 

Tony Miller made motion to adjourn. Stacey Cline 2nd. Motion carried 6-0. Meeting adjourned at 9:12 p.m.

 

 

ATTEST:                                                                                             APPROVED:

 

 

 

Tammy Owen, City Clerk                                                                     Joseph G. Sohm, Mayor

672 Twelve Oaks Dr
, Mt. Washington was present to address the Council on the sign on Paroquet Springs. He stated his farm has been in business in Shepherdsville for over 30 years. He stated they have had 3 or 4 businesses and still operate 3 and as a business owner and taxpayer, feels like the sign on Paroquet Springs which has been there for approximately 30 years should be allowed to stay. He stated they have found no Ordinance that dates back to 1978. He stated they don’t know what’s happened on this issue. He stated that Paroquet Springs was started in 1972. Some business people here in Shepherdsville and surrounding areas actually were involved in the original purchase. He stated over the years they have added several businesses to Shepherdsville and at this point they feel like that they should be given the opportunity to address the Council and understand why all of a sudden this sign has been decided it’s unsightly. He stated he realizes it’s not the prettiest sign, it should have been reconditioned; he stated they made those plans in June after a call from City Attorney Wantland and he thinks the Tourism Commission had asked him one time prior to that about working on it. He stated in June they started working on the sign, in January was asked to come before the Council and explain what we were doing. He stated he knows of no regulation that required them to do that but they felt obligated and committed that we wanted the Shepherdsville Council, Mayor and Attorney to understand what we were doing so if they had any comments they could be addressed. He stated at that meeting he understands there was nothing said about the sign coming down. He stated there were several statements made about how bad it looked, there were several comments made about him personally not taking an interest in Paroquet Springs. He stated he has been involved in that project since the beginning. He stated he plans on being in it until it’s finished. He stated the next morning he received a call that the Council had decided that the sign should come down. He stated there was no discussion in this Council about the sign being torn down. He stated it was a surprise when he received that call the next morning concerning that. He stated he did request to come and speak and due to some vandalism was unable to attend the following Council meeting. He stated he does not understand all the circumstances all the sudden why there is a requirement for a turning lane. He stated there is sufficient pavement there now for a left turn lane if the Council feels like that is necessary. He stated he’s not one to say that it is not because you have a left turn lane already designated. He stated if you want to move it to the other lane there is approximate storage for 3 to 4 cars. He stated he does believe there is a 100 foot right of way. He stated when they built Paroquet Springs they allocated 100 feet of right of way to roads and sections so that there would be sufficient right of way for four lanes of traffic and more and that 100 foot of right of way is still there. He stated he would like to get a reasoning or an explanation or what we can do as the business people in Paroquet, as tax payers. He stated there are actually some businesses that want to locate on this sign that’s paying the 2% food tax in Shepherdsville. He stated there are other businesses, taxpayers in that development, the YMCA for example, who wants to be on the sign. He stated the first person they contacted was the Tourism Commission, Elaine Wilson, for the City of Shepherdsville, and she said yes I want to be on the sign. He stated that was their goal at that point that the Tourism Commission to be on the top two slots on that sign. He stated in January they were informed the Tourism Commission decided not to go on it, and that’s fine. He stated he has no reason to think that there was anything other than the fact that they decided not to do it. He stated there are other businesses that would like to be located on that top spot. He stated the Paroquet Springs sign is designating that whole development which does include the Convention Center and for the Council, again it’s hard for me to understand why within a short period of time the decision was made to have this sign torn down. He stated that his question at this point, is there anything, he stated he was begging on the mercy of the Council, is there anything that we as business people in Paroquet Springs can do to have reconsideration as to removal of this sign by the City of Shepherdsville. Mayor Sohm stated that first of all he just wanted to make one thing clear, and that was that he had a letter from Elaine Wilson from the Tourism Commission stating that in no time did she or the Commission say they would take space on that sign. He stated that for some reason you, Mr. Stout, and Elaine Wilson are not in agreement on that point. Mr. Stout stated he also had a letter from Elaine Wilson that stated she was sending a letter stating that the Tourism Commission was interested in taking over the sign, refurbishing it or replacing it. The letter went on to state that if Stouts wanted to be added to their sign that would be no problem. The letter also went on to include a transfer of ownership to the Tourism Commission. He stated at that time (September 27, 2005) her interest was to purchase the sign, refurbish it or rebuild it for the same purpose that I’m here tonight for; to have it to promote the Paroquet Springs development. He stated if that is not feasible then he feels like maybe the City of Shepherdsville should look at an alternative to allow them some space. He stated they didn’t have any space. The right of way is to the property line. Each business on each side goes to the right of way which is normal. He stated if the City could allow them a section up front, it wouldn’t do them any good to advertise in the rear of the property. He stated he was just asking for an alternative to their dilemma at this point. City Attorney Wantland asked Mr. Stout how fast he could come up with an alternative.  Mr. Stout stated he did not think he could without the City’s approval or suggestion. He stated he did not think there was an alternative unless there was right of way granted in the City’s right of way with some longevity to it to allow them to build a sign. City Attorney Wantland stated he didn’t want to have the Council react to what has been a long term eyesore of this sign and deprive all the businesses in Paroquet an opportunity for signage along the right of way. He stated the City is interested in the turning lane. He stated first and foremost they wish to have three lanes; one to turn to the east, one to turn west and one to proceed in a northerly direction in that one area. He stated he hears what you are saying, that you want an alternative, but the City wants the right of way to be used for cars and for traffic. He stated he also hears businesses saying we want the same opportunity as to compete fairly and to have signage to advertise our business in the front of the development along Highway 44. He stated if that’s your alternative, we’ll be happy to talk to you with the parameter being there will be a left hand turning lane. Mayor Sohm stated he thinks the only alternative would be to put a sign off to one side, the best case scenario, the best marketing idea, would be to put it on what would be the southwest corner because most of the traffic coming in for the restaurants and getting gas and so forth would be coming from the Interstate so they would see the sign in that corner when they pull in. Mr. Stout stated there is a sign there that belongs to Chevron and if you go beyond that you are in their access drive to get to their station. City Attorney Wantland again asked what was the alternative. Mr. Stout stated there is a lane there that is not being used today. He stated it will stack approximately 3 to 4 vehicles. He stated it’s a concrete lane. Mayor Sohm stated that’s not true he’s been out there with engineers from the State to measure, and if you’re talking about that space in front of the sign, that will not hold 4 or 5 car storage. More than 2 is not correct. Mayor Sohm stated they’ve measured that, you have to account for the radius for the vehicles turning in off of Highway 44 coming from the Interstate and vehicles pulling out. Mr. Stout asked if there had been a study that determined that there is that much traffic that requires the third lane. City Attorney Wantland stated the State has approved a third lane. Mr. Stout stated he thinks it’s a shame for these taxpayers and these business people that have been here all these years, there should have been another alternative that the City should have allowed. CA Wantland stated those businesses are not on the sign now. Mayor Sohm stated if they’ve been there for 30 years they haven’t had a sign. Mr. Stout stated its mind boggling that all of a sudden this decision has been made without any input from the people or the businesses there at Paroquet. Councilwoman Trina Summers addressed Mr. Stout about why all the sudden, after 15 years, he wanted to fix the sign. She feels it’s an eyesore and needs to go. Mayor Sohm stated he thinks the position of the Council is that no one who is in this development or has been there in the last 5, 10, 20, 30 years is gaining any form of advertisement, any form of marketing value, anything whatsoever other than their patrons have to drive by and see this ugly mess before they get to their store. Mr. Stout stated he doesn’t think we are here to debate the issue, he’s asking for reconsideration. The business people deserve a sign. City Attorney Wantland stated that is the only thing that bothers him about this is that there are a lot of businesses back there that may want to have some signage and he does not want to take that opportunity when you say there is an alternative. He stated he is interested to explore that. He stated he wanted all business owners in that community to know that an alternative will be considered that they would have some signage. You brought that up and I thought that was fair. Mayor Sohm stated he thinks it’s a good idea to have signage, you want businesses to be able to advertise. Mayor Sohm stated that if you have an alternative he would be glad to listen to it. Mr. Stout stated the Chevron sign is up about 15 feet closer than the Paroquet Springs sign so he knows they are at the edge of the right of way or within a couple feet. He stated that he is sure that the property owner there is going to complain if we get signage next to him. He stated there is a possibility on the other side next to Taco Bell as long as it’s not back on the property because of power lines. LG&E will not let us build underneath a power line. So the only alternative is some additional right of way that may be granted by the City to let us use the right of way that’s on the east side on the Highway 44 area. He stated it may be there in that corner. He stated there is enough sufficient right of way to do that, there is a guardrail, maybe it can be put there. He it would allow traffic in the left turn lane to see the sign and even coming from the other direction, could see it. He stated again he thinks the City would have to be willing to let us use the City’s right of way or a small portion of it because their right of way is only 100 feet. He stated if it gets out into the State right of way, the State is not going to give an inch. Mayor Sohm stated we’re listening and asked Mr. Stout to get a layout of that area. It may need to be updated but get your engineer to work on something, draw it up and come to us with an idea. Mr. Stout stated he appreciated the opportunity and he would look at it to see if there is an alternative and if there is he will bring it back to the Council and Mayor.

First Street
and Frank E. Simon parks. PWF Walls stated they had not been able to put in the playground equipment yet because they had been short staffed. He hoped to get it in soon.

 


Web Design and Hosting by mediamarketers.com